Kuribo64
Views: 14,239,011 Home | Forums | Uploader | Wiki | Object databases | IRC
Rules/FAQ | Memberlist | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Last posts | Search
05-06-21 12:28 PM
Guest:

Main - Posts by marioGamer


marioGamer
Posted on 11-05-12 05:06 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1162
Hey, first i want to say that my english is very bad!

I know that Kuribo closed his old site, but why does he cancled the development of the editor? I think it would be very cool, if he release a new version with the announced features.

Sorry if im in the wrong section :/



marioGamer
Posted on 11-05-12 05:36 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1164
I think there is a group who is really interested in the development.

marioGamer
Posted on 11-05-12 05:53 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1166
You need to keep working. which then displays that you want to improve the sm64ds rom hacks.
I also tried to work with your editor but it crashed really often.

marioGamer
Posted on 11-06-12 01:45 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1172
Make a poll, where people, who are interested in coding SM64DSe can enter the group.
I think that you have to do the first step :/

marioGamer
Posted on 11-06-12 01:54 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1175
But its sad that you throw your development away and all the time that you spend with coding it. I am sure if you continue your work, and make a small demo or something, automaticly a group will form.

marioGamer
Posted on 11-06-12 02:04 PM, in Super Mario 64 DS Editor New Version? Link | #1180
Sorry but i have not the time and the skills to learn C#. But im really interested in the SM64DS Editor.
I only tried to wake up your interest... i failed :(

Thank you anyway for your answer!


Main - Posts by marioGamer

Page rendered in 0.046 seconds. (2048KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 22, rows: 113/113, time: 0.042 seconds.
[powered by Acmlm] Acmlmboard 2.064 (2018-07-20)
© 2005-2008 Acmlm, Xkeeper, blackhole89 et al.