Views: 20,057,003 |
Home
| Forums
| Uploader
| Wiki
| Object databases
| IRC
Rules/FAQ | Memberlist | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Last posts | Search |
04-26-24 08:53 AM |
Guest: |
0 users reading YouTube, why is your comment system so shitty? | 1 bot |
Main - General Chat - YouTube, why is your comment system so shitty? | Hide post layouts | New reply |
SquidEmpress |
| ||
Faking your suicide is a terrible thing to do. Get out. Level: 100 Posts: 2878/2912 EXP: 10066011 Next: 288385 Since: 01-30-13 Last post: 3199 days ago Last view: 3198 days ago |
So I posted a comment on this video to show to all of you just how fucked up YouTube's comment system is nowadays. Take a look at this picture:
Notice how you can only reply/like my comment and the comment I responded to. The other comments, you can't do shit because Google+ was not implemented yet. Also, replies to made comments nowadays appear beneath the comment that is being replied to. Notice that the other two comments that are replies say "in to reply blah blah blah" and the comment that it replied to does not appear above them. All I have to say is excellent designing, YouTube! A shitty comment system is definitely the way to go! In all seriousness, this is terrible designing. But alas, YouTube will only continue to fuck up their overall layout. This is just with commenting. What about the rest of the site's interfaces? YouTube keeps on making their interface shittier and when you're getting used to their shitty design, they introduce a new design that is even shittier. ____________________ Super Mario LOLand Thanks to kaj for helping to port my Acmlmboard 2.5 layout to Acmlmboard 2.064! |
GreenThunder1337 |
| ||
Fuzzy Good riddance! Level: 55 Posts: 124/785 EXP: 1259345 Next: 54844 Since: 05-05-15 From: secret Last post: 2911 days ago Last view: 2303 days ago |
Take it up with google.
Meh. :I ____________________ NNID: GreenThunder1337 3DS FC: 1521 - 5979 - 1511 |
MercuryPenny |
| ||
Normal user Level: 53 Posts: 356/712 EXP: 1143905 Next: 13214 Since: 05-24-14 From: :mroF Last post: 1136 days ago Last view: 1135 days ago |
It's what Google does. Take things that have a monopoly on something and don't suck and make them suck so bad that it's intolerable but you have no other alternatives because ultimately it's still better than bing or dailymotion.
Google+ is literally the worst thing in the multiverse though. |
Anthe |
| ||
Member I have found a basket to put in my SD card reader so I never lose it Level: 66 Posts: 813/1099 EXP: 2380598 Next: 81253 Since: 08-17-12 From: Belgium Last post: 768 days ago Last view: 359 days ago |
There's nothing wrong with Google+ in my opinion. The social network itself is really nice if you take part of a community and I enjoy its integration. ____________________ |
Lunarius |
| ||
Member > Custom title goes here < Semi-Normal User Level: 39 Posts: 231/335 EXP: 396584 Next: 8187 Since: 11-11-12 From: The United States of America.『アメリカ合衆国。』 Last post: 2727 days ago Last view: 2600 days ago |
Posted by SquidEmpress SquidEmpress, y u complainin' too much? <Silvreus>I am a random person…
<Silvreus>With a random personality… <Silvreus>With a random life… <Silvreus>How fun. :P |
Arisotura |
| ||
Star Mario in this room you have a pile of apple pies Level: 163 Posts: 3803/9020 EXP: 56275421 Next: 212223 Since: 07-03-12 From: in a box Last post: 15 hours ago Last view: 15 hours ago |
In some videos, the comments lost all hierarchy and appear to be sorted randomly.
All the comments are sorted more or less randomly anyway. Google apparently decided that sorting things by date wasn't cool anymore. ____________________ NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul melonDS the most fruity DS emulator there is zafkflzdasd |
WhatTheHack |
| ||
Shyguy No longer around much. Level: 21 Posts: 9/82 EXP: 42460 Next: 7483 Since: 05-14-15 From: Manitoba, Canada Last post: 3053 days ago Last view: 3053 days ago |
In my honest opinion, it is not the comment system or layout itself that sucks, but rather its users and what/how they post. But that is besides the point of this thread.
Also, this; Posted by StapleButter I have noticed that, except that I think rather than being sorted randomly, comments are sorted, by default, from the highest number of "likes" descending. Not really all that much better In my opinion though. ____________________ I got nothing. To put here, that is. |
wjg |
| ||
Member Normal user Level: 17 Posts: 50/54 EXP: 24540 Next: 203 Since: 11-05-13 Last post: 1547 days ago Last view: 1253 days ago |
Random video from start page of youtube.
Top comment being 5 days ago, 8 likes and 19 reactions. One below that 4 days ago, 72 likes and 14 reactions. Below that 4 days ago, 81 likes and 24 reactions. Below that 5 days ago, 60 likes and 18 reactions. Below that the creators default comment 6 days ago with 1790 likes. Sense ... there is none. |
Lunarius |
| ||
Member > Custom title goes here < Semi-Normal User Level: 39 Posts: 237/335 EXP: 396584 Next: 8187 Since: 11-11-12 From: The United States of America.『アメリカ合衆国。』 Last post: 2727 days ago Last view: 2600 days ago |
Arisotura |
| ||
Star Mario in this room you have a pile of apple pies Level: 163 Posts: 3826/9020 EXP: 56275421 Next: 212223 Since: 07-03-12 From: in a box Last post: 15 hours ago Last view: 15 hours ago |
It's like that infinite scrolling bullshit. They're all jumping on that bandwagon. The first few 'pages', it's cool, you don't need to click anywhere, it automatically loads more for you, wow... but as soon as you want to look at a very old entry, you find yourself scrolling over and over again until your browser crashes because the page grew too big. Or until you accidentally click a link or whatever and have to start over. ____________________ NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul melonDS the most fruity DS emulator there is zafkflzdasd |
Main - General Chat - YouTube, why is your comment system so shitty? | Hide post layouts | New reply |
Page rendered in 0.037 seconds. (2048KB of memory used) MySQL - queries: 31, rows: 217/217, time: 0.011 seconds. Acmlmboard 2.064 (2018-07-20) © 2005-2008 Acmlm, Xkeeper, blackhole89 et al. |