Views: 8,823,724 Home | Forums | Uploader | Wiki | Object databases | IRC
Rules/FAQ | Memberlist | Calendar | Stats | Online users | Last posts | Search
10-20-18 11:28 PM
Guest:

0 users reading The Cackletta Chronicles (also: enhancing our dictatorship) | 1 bot

Main - Glass trash - The Cackletta Chronicles (also: enhancing our dictatorship) Thread closed

Pages: 1 2 3
StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 06:18 AM (rev. 2 of 07-17-15 10:40 PM) Link | #48864
I originally thought that they were just junkies who thought this board was their personal playground for when they're bored. But nope, turns out it's the good old 'staplebutter is a dictator'.

[11:29:13] <Cackletta> Why would I attack NSMBHD?
[11:29:13] <Cackletta> The board is cool
[11:29:14] <Cackletta> And the admins don't ban people for fun
[11:29:15] <Cackletta> Unlike you
[11:29:16] <Cackletta> And they didn't use blargboard, that's awesome
[11:29:23] <Cackletta> Since you put exploits in it
[11:29:39] <Cackletta> So you can hack people's boards, why are people using it

Long story short, they just need to grow up a few years. Throwing around bullshit claims and not even trying to prove them is such a mark of maturity.

Pretty much like anyone who ever called me a dictator, heh. (and don't get me started on their attempts to run boards)




Claiming that Blargboard contains exploits on purpose (or backdoors) is utter bullshit, especially if you don't even try to show an actual potential exploit to prove it.

Blargboard is on Github, and any changes made to it are reported in the IRC channel and on the board. If I tried to add backdoors, it would be obvious.

Besides, this board uses Blargboard too. Anyone who knows me knows how security is important to me. When I originally set up K64, one of the first things I did was disable destructive thread deletion. Why? If someone managed to hack into the board, I didn't want them to be able to permanently destroy threads.

When implementing or redesigning features, I always think of the scenario of a successful hack attack and try to minimize the damages such an attack could cause.

With that in mind, do you still seriously think I would go out of my way to put backdoors in Blargboard (which is, I repeat, open-source)?


Yes, several Blargboard boards happened to get taken over. None of these takeovers involved a Blargboard exploit. In most cases, what happened is that the board owner gave someone too much power and said person abused it. That's all.




And so, I supposedly ban people 'for fun'. Haha, no. I just can't let people go and say that.

Every person I banned, I had a good reason to ban them.

Sometimes the reason is not obvious. Sometimes, the user's posts look fine, but it's about something they told me in PM.

Sometimes, I also use the board as a means to make someone stop their shit in IRC or somewhere else. This is against my own policy (what happens outside of the board stays outside), but sometimes it's the only thing that works.


Besides, most people are given several chances before getting a truly permanent ban. For example, given all the chances we gave to mariogalaxythree or StarLand, I really don't believe I deserve to be called a dictator.


As you may already know, Skelux has been banned before. That was for basically shitting on my authority. This is something I don't take lightly. No matter how 'good' a user is, if they can't be assed to respect the few rules we have and use common sense, they're bound to cause trouble someday. This is why I always ban such users early.

So, back to Skelux. A while later, I gave him a second chance (his ban was supposed to be permanent). Rather nice of mine, isn't it?

Not only did he not come back, but he engaged in a lame attack (making garbage accounts) along with Cackletta/MrGreenThunder, and they even tried to get more SMWC people to attack our board.

(It should be noted that SMWC is not our enemy. The admins there stopped the two morons from trying to invite more people into their shit.)

Long story short, Skelux is an ungrateful twat and really doesn't deserve to be treated like he is outside of here.




This is an open announcement. There is someone you think was banned unfairly? Have something to say about this post? Something to say about how I run the board? Go right ahead.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Lunarius
Posted on 10-01-14 07:41 AM Link | #48870
You being dictator? I don't you are one. I believe banned users say that because they can't accept their wrong-doing and want to get back at the admins for banning them, thus lowering their reputation.




<Silvreus>I am a random person…
<Silvreus>With a random personality…
<Silvreus>With a random life…
<Silvreus>How fun. :P



StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 07:53 AM Link | #48872
Or they're just too young/retarded to understand the rules and why they get banned.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Fiachra
Posted on 10-01-14 09:11 AM Link | #48873
I think that this is quite interesting and explains a lot of their behaviour, they think they're somehow smarter than everyone else and that they know better than the writer of those rules. It really is disturbing though just how stupid some of them are, it's a wonder they remember to breathe.

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 09:23 AM Link | #48874
Quite possibly.

It's a shame. Skelux would otherwise be quite an interesting person.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Lemonjuice
Posted on 10-01-14 10:19 AM (rev. 2 of 10-01-14 10:20 AM) Link | #48875
Skelux has nothing to do with this...

You can clearly see this is cackletta's idea.



Aren't lemons just adorable?

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 10:22 AM Link | #48876
Skelux was involved in the attack. As such, he is responsible too.

Oh and he doesn't care about authority, anyway. That fact was established long ago and alone it's a good enough reason for a ban.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Lemonjuice
Posted on 10-01-14 10:27 AM (rev. 3 of 10-01-14 10:28 AM) Link | #48877
I don't care about any bans. Skelux did agree on the fact that he is involved. Also I asked cackletta (who was added in our chatgroup for no reason + pointing out we talked "shit" about him) to say hi to you from me, but he didn't do it. :l

So, hi.

PS: None of us stopped him since we expected him to get banned right away anyways. >.>



Aren't lemons just adorable?

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 10:34 AM Link | #48878
If that means you're giving your account to Cackletta, I'll have to ban you. Even if it's not Cackletta, account sharing only makes things confusing and harder for us admins to keep track of, so don't do it please.


So Cackletta caused shit in #nsmbhd, got banned, etc. Funny private conversation follows. Sit back and enjoy.

He thinks that dodging the bans to cause more shit is the solution. Genius!

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Lemonjuice
Posted on 10-01-14 10:38 AM Link | #48879
What? Account sharing with someone I dislike? I never mentioned that. Also I don't really care about him. I am actually defending the general audience.



Aren't lemons just adorable?

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 10:39 AM Link | #48880
Oh sorry, nevermind then.

Posted by Lemonjuice
I asked cackletta (who was added in our chatgroup for no reason + pointing out we talked "shit" about him) to say hi to you from me, but he didn't do it.

It was that part that confused me.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Lemonjuice
Posted on 10-01-14 10:43 AM Link | #48881
Ah, I am sorry. It's our romhacking skype group. Random romhackers (mostly m64) and some tassers/speedrunners are in that group. But cackletta got added to it and tried to leave but we have a rule that nobody is allowed to leave except traitors. That's what I ment with what I just said. I am sorry for the confusion. Also Skelux is in that group. Do not worry though, I never participate with anything they want to do. I am just in there for my hacks.



Aren't lemons just adorable?

MercuryPenny
Posted on 10-01-14 11:53 AM (rev. 2 of 07-17-15 10:46 PM by StapleButter) Link | #48882
I didn't know that Skelux even had any part in it. All I knew was that MrGreenThunder decided to go all moron (more than usual anyways) and spam the site. If I recall correctly it was all MrGreenIdiot's idea.

[11:29:23] <Cackletta> Since you put exploits in it
[11:29:39] <Cackletta> So you can hack people's boards, why are people using it
He's probably talking about the RydiaSax thing. Even then, that was in no way a mistake on the software's part.

(It should be noted that SMWC is not our enemy. The admins there stopped the two morons from trying to invite more people into their shit.)

True that. Several of our members (including myself) are from SMWC. I think I may have been on #smwc when MrGreen (his IRC nick) was being an idiot and inviting people to spam the site even more. He's IP banned, right?


send me your terrible userbars and such to advertize in my footer ;^)
[image]

youtube i never use

CRAWLING IN MY CRAWL THESE CRAWLS THEY WILL NOT CRAWL

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 12:02 PM Link | #48884
I got logs indicating Skelux would have been part of it. May be wrong, but I remember having a private convo with him and he was being a retard, so uh.

About Rydia's board, no Blargboard exploit was involved. I hijacked one of the admins' accounts, that's all.

Cackletta is banned. Maybe there's also an IP ban, I don't remember. I tend to reserve those for extreme cases where a regular ban isn't enough.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Kazeshin
Posted on 10-01-14 12:38 PM Link | #48888
Posted by StapleButter
I remember having a private convo with him[Skelux] and he was being a retard, so uh.


This might be too much to expect, but could you post some kind of chatlog?
Whenever i've talked to Skelux he seemed to be quite rational and - whenever it was important - he seemed mature and serious.
That's why im curious.

StapleButter
Posted on 10-01-14 12:41 PM Link | #48889
I went and fished it from my IRC logs just for you.

Here you go.

He pretty much admits his responsibility in the attack.

____________________
NSMBHD - Kafuka - Jul

communism

Hiccup
Posted on 10-01-14 01:35 PM (rev. 2 of 10-01-14 01:36 PM) Link | #48890
Gah, these things annoy me. (Probably because I was banned from TCRF/Zelda IRC channel by someone, I don't think I even comprehended why).

NeoBlitzX7
Posted on 10-01-14 02:52 PM Link | #48894
I thought only Cackletta was doing shit. So now I know why Skelux' SMSR thread was so quite in the last time...

shibboleet
Posted on 10-01-14 03:35 PM (rev. 2 of 07-17-15 10:46 PM by StapleButter) Link | #48896
[16:25:02] <Cackletta> and leave to keep being a gaytard
>so intellegent
>used gaytard


Sigh, people need to grow up.

____________________
a

SquidEmpress
Posted on 10-01-14 03:38 PM (rev. 2 of 10-01-14 03:39 PM) Link | #48897
This is typical behavior of manipulative people who brainwash people with their lies. Never believe them, because you'll just find yourself brainwashed. And StapleButter isn't a dictator at all. He unbanned Skelux before but of course, Skelux is "an ungrateful twat".


On a lighter note, here is an example of a REAL dictatorship. :P
there's only one dictator here and that's me
No, I am!
--- SquidGirl has banned *!*@*
:)
--- SquidGirl has unbanned *!*@*
LOL. :D


Uh... anyway, I've seen REAL dictator admins before. For example, admins that just ban you because they don't like you. StapleButter isn't like this . I'm pretty sure that if Skelux and Cackletta ran a board together, they would ban StapleButter if he were to ever register on their board, but obviously why would SB even register at such a board like that? ;)

I was once of the admins on Rydia's dead board and I remember how Cackletta was acting like a douche over his lmaery on Kuribo64 and Skelux registered, and Skelux was being manipulative, ironically accusing StapleButter himself of being manipulative.

So in the end, these whiny kids need to grow the fuck up and stop being like "StapleButter is a dictator!!!11!!11!"

____________________
Super Mario LOLand

Thanks to Tierage for helping to port my Acmlmboard 2.5 layout to Acmlmboard 2.064!

Pages: 1 2 3

Main - Glass trash - The Cackletta Chronicles (also: enhancing our dictatorship) Thread closed

Page rendered in 0.028 seconds. (2048KB of memory used)
MySQL - queries: 30, rows: 235/235, time: 0.016 seconds.
[powered by Acmlm] Acmlmboard 2.064 (2018-07-20)
© 2005-2008 Acmlm, Xkeeper, blackhole89 et al.